logo
Medical news
of the North Caucasus
Scientific journal
Mass media registration certificate dated December 7, 2006.
Series ПИ #ФС 77-26521.
Federal service for surveillance over non-violation of the legislation in the sphere of mass communications and protection of cultural heritage.
ISSN 2073-8137
rus
русский
eng
english

Site search



Correspondence address
310 Mira Street, Stavropol, Russia, 355017

Tel
+7 865 2352511, +7 865 2353229.

E-mail
medvestnik@stgmu.ru

Basic patterns of human fetal mandible development

[Morphology]
Anastasia Neprokina; Elena Dmitrievna Lutsay; Alexandr Korobkeev; Oxana Lezhnina;

At the current stage of fetal medicine development, it is relevant to study the formation of fetal organs and systems in order to identify new markers of combined pathology. This study aimed to identify the primary patterns in the development of the human fetal mandible during the intermediate perinatal period of ontogenesis. The material for the study consisted of 110 anatomical complexes, «human fetal mandible and surrounding structures of the maxillofacial region», which were examined using both in vivo and morphological techniques during the intermediate fetal period of ontogenesis. During this period, the fetal mandible was predominantly characterized by platyramimandibular (100 %), mediomandibular (54 %), and mesomandibular (58 %) forms, as determined by morphometric indices. In fetuses of the second trimester, the mandible is formed with uneven growth across all dimensions, with a predominance of growth in the first half of the intermediate fetal period. Individual differences were observed in the localization of the mandibular and mental foramina, as well as in the vari ability of the angle of the fetal mandible. Sex differences were noted by the end of the studied period.

Download

References:
1. Kastamoni Y., Dursun A., Sanli O. C., Yuzbasioglu N., Albay S. Morphometric Development of the Mandible in Fetal Cadavers. J. Craniofac. surg. 2020;31(7):2036-2039. https://doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0000000000006670
2. Neprokina A. V., Naidenova S. I., Lutsai E. D., Kirksova L. S., Astafyev I. V. [et al.] Ultrasound anatomy of the head and maxillofacial region in the intermediate fetal period of human ontogenesis. Medical News of North Caucasus. 2021;16(4):408-412. https://doi.org/10.14300/mnnc.2021.16097
3. Zheleznov L. M., Levanova O. A., Nikiforova S. A., Sarenko S. A. Anatomical foundations of optimization of ultrasound screening studies in perinatology. Journal of anatomy and histopathology. 2018;7(4):20-26. https://doi.org/10.18499/2225-7357-2018-7-4-20-26
4. Neprokina A. V., Lutsai E. D., Vinidiktova M. A. Anatomical characteristics of the mandible in human fetuses of the second trimester. Saratov Scientific and Medical Journal. 2022;18(2):266-271.
5. Neprokina A. V., Lutsai E. D., Vinidiktova M. A. Age-related features of the anatomy and topography of the fetal mandible according to the ultrasound scanning method. Volgograd Scientific and Medical Journal. 2022;19(4):16-21.
6. Devyatirikov D. A., Putalova I. N., Suslo A. P., Artyukhov A. V. Morphometric parameters of the upper and mandible of Omsk girls according to telerentgenography of the head. Bulletin of New Medical Technologies. Electronic edition. 2021;15(4):14-17. https://doi.org/10.24412/2075-4094-2021-4-1-2
7. Alekseev V. P., Debets V. P. Craniometry. Methodology of anthropological research. Academy of Sciences of the USSR. Institute of Ethnography named after Miklukho-Maklaya. Moscow : Nauka Publ., 1964.
8. Gajvoronskij I. V., Gajvoronskaja M. G., Fandeeva O. M., Shashkov V. A. Typical features of the morphometric parameters of the mandible in an adult. Kursk scientific and Practical Bulletin Man and His Health. 2020;(2):34-41. https://doi.org/10.21626/2020-2/05
9. Gajvoronskiy I. V., Gajvoronskaja M. G., Shashkov V. A. Anatomical substantiation of the classification of mandibular forms. Morphology. 2019;155,(2):70-71. https://doi.org/10.17816/102555
10. Vos F. I., De Jong-Pleij E. A., Bakker M. E., Tromp E., Manten G. T. R. [et al.] Facial profile markers in second and third-trimesterfetuseswith trisomy 18. Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2015;46(1):66-72. https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.14662
11. Neprokina A. V., Lutsai E. D. Topographic and anatomical relationships of the mandible and auricle in human prenatal ontogenesis. science and innovations in medicine. 2023;8(1):13-16. https://doi.org/10.35693/2500-1388-2023-8-1-13-16
12. Kalmin O. V., Goryacheva E. V., Zyulkina L. A. Variant anatomy and dimensional characteristics of the head and mandible depending on the sex and shape of the skull in people of the first period of adulthood. Saratov Scientific and Medical Journal. 2024;20(2):219-222.
13. Aleshkina O. Y., Nikolenko V. N. Basicranial typology of human skull construction: monograph. Moscow: Publishing House of the I. M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, 2014.
14. Andreeva E. N., Sepulveda W., Odegova N. O. A new echographic sign for the study of the fetal mandible in normal and pathological conditions (micrognathia) in the first trimester of pregnancy (11–14 weeks). sonoAceUltrasound. 2013;25:22-27.
15. Tonni G., Peixoto A. B., Werner H., Grisolia G., Ruano R. [et al.] Ultrasound and fetal magnetic resonance imaging: Clinical performance in the prenatal diagnosis of orofacial clefts and mandibular abnormalities. Clin. Ultrasound. 2023;51(2):346-361. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcu.23403
16. Paladini D. Fetal micrognathia: almost always an ominous finding. Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2010;35(4):377-384. https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.7639
17. Galea C. J., Dashow J. E., Woerner J. E. Congenital Abnormalities of the Temporomandibular Joint. Oral and maxillofacial surgery clinics of North America. 2018;30(1):71-82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coms.2017.09.003
18. Nicot R., Rotten D., Opdenakker Y. Kverneland B., Ferri J. [et al]. Fetal dental panorama on three-dimensional ultrasound imaging of cleft lip and palate and other facial anomalies. Clinical Oral Investigations. 2019;23(4):1561-1568. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-018-2586-8
19. Seabra M., Vaz P., Valente F., Braga A., Felino A. Two- dimensional identification of fetal tooth germs. The Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal. 2017;54(2):166–169. https://doi.org/10.1597/14-128
20. Wiechers C., Poets C., Hoopmann M., Kagan K. O. Fetal profile markers for the detection of robin sequence in fetuses with retrognathia. Ultraschall in der Medizin. 2021. URL: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34852370/ (date of access: 02.02.2023).
21. Jong-Pleij de E., Bilardo C. M. Diagnosis and Manage ment of Abnormalities of the Face. Fetal Medicine: Basic Science and Clinical Practice. P. Pranav. Philadelphia : Elsevier, 2020:402-426. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-7020-6956-7.00035-X
22. Neprokina A. V., Lutsai E. D., Naidenova S. I., Lebedyantsev A. V. A program for calculating the level of fetoanomal alertness according to the method of fetal ultrasound scanning in human prenatal ontogenesis. Certificate of registration of a computer program № 2023664258 dated 07.03.2023.

Keywords: mandible, intermediate fetal period of ontogenesis, anatomy


Founders:
Stavropol State Medical Academy
Pyatigorsk State Research Institute of Balneotherapeutics
Pyatigorsk State Pharmaceutical Academy