• Main page
• About the journal
• Editorial board
• Subscription
• Information for contributors
• Editorial and Peer Review
• Issues archive
• Authors
• Articles
  • By alphabet
  • By category
• Blogs and comments

The journal is included into The list of leading scientific periodicals.

The journal is included into VINITI database and is registered in Electronic scientific library.

The journal is indexed by SCOPUS, Ulrich's International Periodicals Directory.

EBSCO

https://doi.org/10.14300/mnnc.2025.20006

Comparative analyses of complications development during sinus lift surgery

[Stomatology]
Henri Igorevich Agrba; Gennady Grebnev; Maxim Igorevich Muzykin; Andrey Sergeevich Bagnenko; Andrey Iordanishvili; Sergey Sirak; Vadim Nikolaevich Lenev; Maria Perikova;

The article presents an analysis of the frequency and severity of complications that occur during sinus lifting surgery using piezosurgical equipment and rotary instruments. At the first stage of the study, a prospective survey of practicing specialists was performed. At the second stage, the frequency of complications was studied. The division into study groups was carried out taking into account the method of performing sinus lifting surgery: Group 1 – using a rotary instrument, Group 2 – using piezosurgical equipment. It was found that in both groups, regardless of the method of surgical treatment, intraoperative and early postoperative complications prevailed. In the early postoperative period, suture disruption, bleeding, and infectious complications in the form of acute sinusitis were more common. In the late postoperative period, infectious complications in the form of chronic sinusitis, periimplantitis, as well as loss and migration of the implant in the maxillary sinus were observed.

Download

References:
1. Sipkin A. M., Karyakina I. A., Polupan P. V., Ryabov A. Yu., Davydov I. A., Akhtyamov D. V. Piezosurgery: systematic review of literature and surgical experience. Medicinskij alfavit. – Medical alphabet. 2018;2(8):25-28. (In Russ.).
2. Molina A., Sanz-Sánchez I., Sanz-Martín I., Ortiz-Vigón A., Sanz M. Complications in sinus lifting procedures: Classification and management. Periodontol 2000. 2022;88(1):103-115. https://doi.org/10.1111/prd.12414
3. Ilyasov D. M., Yurkevich E. V., Navalieva A. T., Idris M. I. Rossijskij vestnik dentalʹnoj implantologii. – Russian Journal of Dental Implantology. 2023;(1):39-47. (In Russ.).
4. Musienko A. I., Nesterova K. I., Gileva O. S., Iordanishvili A. K. Ways to improve the quality of life in patients with adentia and chronic periodontitis associated with maxillary sinusitis at the stages of dental prosthetics. Folia Otorhinolaryngologiae et Pathologiae Respiratoriae. 2023;29(2):12-23. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.33848/foliorl23103825-2023-29-2-12-23
5. Grebnev G. A., Bagnenko А. S., Muzikin M. I., Agrba A. I., Voskresenskaya Yu. L. Sinus lift surgery: Risk factors for schneiderian membrane perforation. Meditsinskiy Vestnik MVD. – Medical Bulletin of the Ministry of Internal Affairs. 2024;131(4):2-5. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.52341/20738080_2024_121_4_2
6. Rubnikovich S. P., Khomich I. S. Clinical comparison of the effectiveness of piezosurgery application in sinus lift surgery. Stomatolog. Minsk. – Dentist. Minsk. 2019;32(1):50-55. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.32993/stomatologist.2019.1(32).9
7. Kalyvas D., Kapsalas A., Paikou S. Thickness of the Schneiderian membrane and its correlation with anatomical structures and demographic parameters using CBCT tomography: a retrospective study. International Journal of Implant Dentistry. 2018;4(32):16-24. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40729-018-0143-5
8. Shahakbari R., Labafchi A., Salami S., Samieirad S. Piezotome versus surgical bur: which is more effective in reducing the postoperative pain and edema following open sinuslift surgery? Journal of Maxillofacial and Oral Surgery. 2021;20(4):642-648. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12663-020-01391-2
9. Ilyin S. V., Bobyntsev I. I., Grebnev G. A., Iordanishvili A. K. Pathophysiological aspects of bone tissue regeneration when increasing the width of the jaw alveolar crest with the application of piezosurgical technique. Chelovek i ego zdorov’e. – Humans and their health. 2022;25(1):4-10. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.21626/vestnik/2022-1/01
10. Atieh M. A., Alsabeeha N. H. M., Tawse-Smith A., Duncan W. J. Piezoelectric versus conventional implant site preparation: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research. 2018;20(2):261-270. https://doi.org/10.1111/cid.12555
11. Arakji H., Osman E., Aboelsaad N., Shokry M. Evaluation of implant site preparation with piezosurgery versus conventional drills in terms of operation time, implant stability and bone density (randomized controlled clinical trial- split mouth design). BMC Oral Health. 2022;22(1):567. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-022-02613-4
12. Maihemaiti M., Ainiwaer A., Wang L. A clinical study of the piezosurgery, high-speed contra-angle handpiece, and the combined application of both for extraction of embedded supernumerary teeth. BMC Oral Health. 2023;23(1):147. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-023-02829-y
13. Jordi C., Mukaddam K., Lambrecht J. T., Kühl S. Membrane perforation rate in lateral maxillary sinus floor augmentation using conventional rotating instruments and piezoelectric device-a meta-analysis. Int. J. Implant. Dent. 2018;4(1):3. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40729-017-0114-2
14. Stacchi C., Troiano G., Berton F., Lombardi T., Rapani A. [et al.]. Piezoelectric bone surgery for lateral sinus floor elevation compared with conventional rotary instruments: A systematic review, meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis. International Journal of Oral Implantology &Clinical Research. 2020;13(2):109-121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijom.2020.03.008
15. Muzikin M. I., Iordanishvili A. K., Losev F. F., Grigoriev S. G. Reparative potential of bone tissue and associated influencing factors. Stomatologija. – Stomatology. 2024;103(2):41-49. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17116/stomat20241030214 1
16. Rubnikovich S. P., Homich I. S. Regenerative dental technologies in complex surgical and prosthetic rehabilitation of patients with dentition defects. Stomatolog. Minsk. – Dentist. Minsk. 2020;2(37):38-50. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.32993/stomatologist.2020.2(37).8
17. Alsharekh M. S., Almutairi A. A., Jahlan A. S., Alhazani A. S., Almohaimeed S. M. [et al.]. Evolving techniques and trends in maxillary sinus lift procedures in implant dentistry: a review of contemporary advances. Cureus. 2024;16(10):e71424. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.71424
18. Muzikin M. I., Kulakov A. A., Iordanishvili A. K., Sle sarev O. V., Terletsky D. V. Comparative assessment of the survival rate of dental implants in conditions of severe bone atrophy. Rossijskij vestnik dentalʹnoj implantologii. – Russian Journal of Dental Implantology. 2023;(2):43-53. (In Russ.).
19. Ke Y., Xuan G. Does sinus membrane thickness influence the risk of perforation during lateral sinus lift surgery for dental implants? a systematic review and metaanalysis. Medicina Oral Patologia Oral y Cirugia Bucal. 2024;29(4):e568-e574. https://doi.org/10.4317/medoral.26545
20. Yang B., Wang T., Wen Y., Liu X. Association between sinus septa and lateral wall thickness with risk of perforation during maxillary sinus lift surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2024;19(8):e0308166. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0308166
21. Alshamrani A. M., Mubarki M., Alsager A. S., Alsharif H. K., Al-Humaidan S. A., Al-Omar A. Maxillary sinus lift procedures: an overview of current techniques, evaluation, and complications. Cureus. 2023;15(11):e49553. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.49553
22. Lozano-Carrascal N., Salomó-Coll O., Gehrke S. A., Calvo Guirado J. L., Hernández-Alfaro F., Gargallo-Albiol J. Radiological evaluation of maxillary sinus anatomy: A cross-sectional study of 300 patients. Annals of Anatomy. 2017;214:1-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aanat.2017.06.002
23. King M. E., Schofield J. Restoratively driven planning for implants in the posterior maxilla – рart 1: alveolar bone healing, bone assessment and linical classifications. British Dental Journal. 2023;235:585-592. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41415-023-6391-7
24. Aghaloo T. L., Misch C., Lin G. H., Iacono V. J., Wang H. L. Bone augmentation of the edentulous maxilla for implant placement: a systematic review. International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants. 2016;23(1):344-353. https://doi.org/10.11607/jomi.16suppl.g1
25. Thalakiriyawa D. S., Dissanayaka W. L. Advances in regenerative dentistry approaches: an update. International Dental Journal. 2024;1(74):25-34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.identj.2023.07.008
26. Shhetinin E. V., Sirak S. V., Grigor’janc L. A., Vafiadi M. Ju., Dilekova O. V. [et al.]. Reparativnaja regeneracija tkanej parodonta – rezul’taty jeksperimental’nogo issledovanija. Medicinskii vestnik Severnogo Kavkaza. – Medical News of North Caucasus. 2015;4(10):411-415. (In Russ.).
https://doi.org/10.14300/mnnc.2015.10100
27. Grimm W. D., Arnold W. A., Sirak S. W., Vukovich M. A., Videra D., Giesenhagen B. Clinical, radiographic, and histological analyses after transplantation of crest-related palatal-derived ectomesenchymal stem cells (paldscs) for improving vertical alveolar bone augmentation in critical size alveolar defects. Journal of Clinical Periodontology. 2015;42(17):366b-366. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpe.12399

Keywords: upper jaw, bone tissue atrophy, maxillary sinus, dental arch defects, sinus lifting, piezosurgery, dental implantation, complications, subantral augmentation