• Main page
• About the journal
• Editorial board
• Subscription
• Information for contributors
• Editorial and Peer Review
• Issues archive
• Authors
• Articles
  • By alphabet
  • By category
• Blogs and comments

The journal is included into The list of leading scientific periodicals.

The journal is included into VINITI database and is registered in Electronic scientific library.

The journal is indexed by SCOPUS, Ulrich's International Periodicals Directory.

EBSCO

https://doi.org/10.14300/mnnc.2021.16025

Non -flapped brest reconstructions options using silicone endoprothesis after subcutaneous mastectomy for cancer

[Reviews]
Samvel Vladimirovich Petrosyants; Arthur Aidemirov; Denis Nikolaevich Rovenskikh; Oksana Vladimirova; Sidorov Sergei; Danila Igorevich Chernopyatov; Vadim Alexandrovich Zotov;

This article provides current information in non-flap breast reconstructions after mastectomy for cancer and influence of radiation therapy on aesthetic results in different variants of breast implant placement. The disadvantages of traditional reconstruction methods, options for installing different types of silicone breast implants and the effectiveness of additional coatings use to increase the thickness of tissues covering the mammary implant are described. The possibility of using a polypropylene mesh implant to increase the thickness of the skin and fat flap is being considered. Рrepectoral positioning of the breast implant shows low risks of general and specific complications.

Download

References:
1. Lopes L. V., Miguel F., Freitas H., Tavares А., Pangui S.[et al.]. Stage at presentation of breast cancer in Luanda, Angola – a retrospective study. BMC Health Serv. Res. 2015;15:471. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-015-1092-9
2. Bray F., Ferlay J., Soerjomataram I., Siegel R. L., Torre L. A. [et al.]. Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J. Clin. 2018;68(6):394-424. https://doi.org/10.3322/caac.21492
3. Wondimagegnehu A., Abebe W., Abraha A., Teferra S. Depression and social support among breast cancer patients in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. BMC Cancer. 2019;19(1):836. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-019-6007-4
4. Runowicz C. D., Leach C. R., Henry N. L., Henry K. S., Mackey H. T. [et al.]. American Society of Clinical Oncology Breast Cancer Survivorship Care Guideline. J. Clin. Oncol. 2016;34(6):611-635. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2015.64.3809
5. Salibian A. A., Frey J. D., Choi M., Karp N. S. Subcutaneous Implant-based Breast Reconstruction with Acellular Dermal Matrix/Mesh: A Syst. Rev. Plast. Reconstr. Surg. – Glob. Open. 2016;4(11):e1139. https://doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000001139
6. Oh C., Winocour S. J., Lemaine V. Latest Trends in Subpectoral Breast Reconstruction. Semin. in Plast. Surg. 2019;33(4):224-228. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0039-1696964
7. Ricci J. A., Epstein S., Momoh A. O., Lin S. J., Singhal D. [et al.]. A meta-analysis of implant-based breast reconstruction and timing of adjuvant radiation therapy. J. Surg. Res. 2017;218:108-116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2017.05.072
8. Giudice G., Maruccia M., Nacchiero E., Elia R., Annoscia P. [et al.]. Dual plane breast implant reconstruction in large sized breasts: How to maximise the result following first stage total submuscular expansion. J. PRAS Open. 2018;31 (15):74-80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpra.2017.11.003
9. Gabriel A., Sigalove S., Sigalove N. M., Storm-Dickerson T. L., Rice J., Pope N., Maxwell G. P. Prepectoral Revision Breast Reconstruction for Treatment of Implant-Associated Animation Deformity: A Review of 102 Reconstructions. Aesthet. Surg. J. 2018;38(5):519-526. https://doi.org/10.1093/asj/sjx261
10. Fracol M., Feld L., Chiu W., Kim J. Y. S. An overview of animation deformity in prosthetic breast reconstruction. Gland Surg. 2018;8(1):95-101. https://doi.org/10.21037/gs.2018.09.09
11. Dyrberg D. L., Bille C., Gunnarsson G. L., Frandsen T. F., Salzberg C. A. [et al.]. Breast animation deformity. Arch. Plast. Surg. 2019;46(1):7-15. https://doi.org/10.5999/aps.2018.00479
12. Nigro L. C., Blanchet N. P. Animation Deformity in Postmastectomy Implant-Based Reconstruction. Plast. Reconstr. Surg. – Glob. Open. 2017;5(7):e1407. https://doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000001407
13. Cattelani L., Polotto S., Arcuri M. F., Pedrazzi G., Linguadoca C. [et al.]. One-Step Prepectoral Breast Reconstruction With Dermal Matrix-Covered Implant Compared to Submuscular Implantation: Functional and Cost Evaluation. Clin. Breast Cancer. 2018;18(4):e703-e711. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clbc.2017.11.015
14. Tasoulis M. K., Iqbal F. M., Cawthorn S., MacNeill F., Vidya R. Subcutaneous implant breast reconstruction: time to reconsider? Eur. J. Surg. Oncol. 2017;43(9):1636-1646. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejso.2017.04.008
15. TerLouw R. P., Nahabedian M. Y. Prepectoral Breast Reconstruction. Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 2017;40(5S):51S-59S. https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0000000000003942
16. Freeman B. S. Subcutaneous mastectomy for benign breast lesions with immediate or delayed prosthetic replacement. Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 1962;30 (6):676-682. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006534-196212000-00008
17. Headon H., Kasem A., Mokbel K. Capsular Contracture after Breast Augmentation: An Update for Clinical Practice. Arch. Plast. Surg. 2015;42(5):532-543. https://doi.org/10.5999/aps.2015.42.5.532
18. Hernia Surge Group. International guidelines for groin hernia management. Hernia. 2018;22(1):1-165. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-017-1668-x
19. Onesti M. G., Maruccia M., Di Taranto G., Albano A., Soda G. [et al.]. Clinical, histological, and ultrasound follow-up of breast reconstruction with one-stage muscle- sparing «wrap» technique: A single-center experience. J. Plast. Reconstr. Aesthet. Surg. 2017;70(11):1527-1536. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjps.2017.06.023
20. Tevlin R., Borrelli M. R., Irizarry D., Nguyen D., Wan D. C. [et al.]. Acellular Dermal Matrix Reduces Myofibroblast Presence in the Breast Capsule. Plast. Reconstr. Surg. – Glob. Open. 2019;7(5):e2213. https://doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000002213
21. Headon H., Kasem A., Mokbel K. Capsular Contracture after Breast Augmentation: An Update for Clinical Practice. Arch. Plast. Surg. 2015;42(5):532-543. https://doi.org/10.5999/aps.2015.42.5.532
22. Zhao X., Wu X., Dong J., Liu Y., Zheng L. [et al.]. A meta- analysis of postoperative complications of tissue expander/ implant breast reconstruction using acellular dermal matrix. Aesthetic. Plast. Surg. 2015;39(06):892-901. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-015-0555-z
23. Sobti N., Ji E., Brown R. L., Cetrulo C. L., Colwell A. S.[et al.]. Evaluation of Acellular Dermal Matrix Efficacy in Prosthesis-Based Breast Reconstruction. Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 2018;141(3):541-549. https://doi.org/10.1097/prs.0000000000004109
24. Wagner R. D., Braun T. L., Zhu H., Winocour S. A systematic review of complications in prepectoral breast reconstruction. J. Plast. Reconstr. Aesthet. Surg. 2019;72(7):1051-1059. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjps.2019.04.005
25. Khalil H. H., Malahias M. N., Youssif S., Ashour T., Rhobaye S. [et al.]. Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy and Prepectoral Implant/Acellular Dermal Matrix Wrap Reconstruction in Large Ptotic Breasts. Plast. Reconstr. Surg. – Glob. Open. 2019;7(7):e2289. https://doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000002289
26. Bernini M., Calabrese C., Cecconi L.,Santi C., Gjondedaj U. [et al.]. Subcutaneous Direct-to-Implant Breast Reconstruction: Surgical, Functional, and Aesthetic Results after Long-Term Follow-Up. Plast.Reconstr. Surg. – Glob. Open. 2016;3(12):e574. https://doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000000533
27. Chopra K., Houssock C., CaiS. S., Drogula C. L., Lily R. [et al.]. Submuscular versus prepectoral immediate implant based breast reconstruction.33NESPS Annual Meeting. October 14-16, 2016. Aviable at: https://meeting.nesps.org/abstracts/2016/57.cgi Accessed October 28,2020.
28. Cox S., Bozzuto L., Bartholomew A., Sosin M., Pittman T. [et al.]. Prepectoral versus retropectoral implant-based reconstruction following nipple-sparing mastectomyand adjuvant radiation therapy. Ann. Surg. Oncol. 2018;25(2):357-358.
29. Schaeffer C. V., Dassoulas K. R., Thuman J., Campbell C. A. Early functional outcomes after prepectoral breast reconstruction: a case-matched cohort study. An. Plast. Surg. 2019;82(6S):S399-S403. https://doi.org/10.1097/SAP.0000000000001669
30. Rodriguez-Unda N., Leiva S., Cheng H. T., Seal S. M., Cooney C. M. [et al.]. Low incidence of complications using polyglactin 910 (Vicryl) mesh in breast reconstruction: A systematic review. J. Plast. Reconstr. Aesthet. Surg. 2015;68(11):1543-1549. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjps.2015.06.018
31. Serrurier L. C., Rayne S., Venter M., Benn C. A. Direct-to-implant breast reconstruction without the use of an acellular dermal matrix is cost effective and oncologically safe. Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 2017;139(04):809-817. https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0000000000003222
32. Casella D., di Taranto G., Marcasciano M., Sordi S., Kothari A. [et al.]. Nipple-sparing bilateral prophylactic mastectomy and immediate reconstruction with TiLoop® Bra mesh in BRCA1/2 mutation carriers: A prospective study of long-term and patient reported outcomes using the BREAST-Q. Breast. 2018;(39):8-13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.breast.2018.02.001
33. Eichler C., Schulz C., Thangarajah F., Malter W., Warm M. [et al.]. A Retrospective Head-to-head Comparison BetweenTiLoop Bra/TiMesh® and Seragyn® in 320 Cases of Reconstructive Breast Surgery. Anticancer Research. 2019;39(5):2599-2605. https://doi.org/10.21873/anticanres.13383
34. Wu F., Zhang X., Liu Y., Cao D., Yu Y. [et al.]. Lightweight mesh versus heavyweight mesh for laparo-endoscopic inguinal hernia repair: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Hernia. 2020;24:31-39. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-019-02016-5
35. Cano-Valderrama O., Porrero J. L., Quirós E., Bonachia О., Castillo M. J. [et al.]. Is Onlay Polypropylene Mesh Repair an Available Option for Incisional Hernia Repair? A Retrospective Cohort Study. Am. Surg. 2019;85(2):183-187. https://doi.org/10.1177/000313481908500226
36. Chizh I. A., Kolar’kova V. V., Semiglazov V. V., Vinogradov I. A., Telishevskii A. V. Opyt prepektoral’noi ustanovki implantov s poliuretanovym pokrytiem pri odnomomentnoi rekonstruktsii molochnoi zhelezy // Tezisy IV Peterburgskogo mezhdunarodnogo onkologicheskogo foruma «Belye nochi 2018». Sankt-Peterburg, 2018:12. Aviable at: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=35290587. Accessed Oсtober 28, 2020. (In Russ.).
37. Sobolevskii V. A. Sovremennye tendentsii v khirurgii molochnoi zhelezy. XXII Rossiiskii onkologicheskii kongress. Moskva, 2018. Available at: https://rosoncoweb.ru/events/2018/11/13/archive. Accessed May 2, 2020. (In Russ.).
38. Volchenko A. A., Kabulieva E. I. Preectoral reconstruction of the mammary glands in patients with breast cancer. Analysis of literature data. Own experience. Issledovaniya i praktika v meditsine. – Res.Pract. Med. J. 2019;6(1S):88. Available at: https://www.rpmj.ru/rpmj/issue/viewIssue/28/3. (In Russ.).
39. Malygin S. E., Kirillova E. L. Sovremennaya odnomomentnaya rekonstruktsiya molochnoi zhelezy implantatami. Vliyanie novykh tekhnicheskikh reshenii i ad»yuvantnoi luchevoi terapii na rezul’taty. Zlokachestvennye opukholi. – Malignant Tumours. 2018;8(3s1):17-21. Aviable at: https://www.malignanttumors.org/jour/article/view/540. Accessed Oсtober 28, 2020. (In Russ.)].
40. Scarpa C., Borso G. F., Vindigni V., Bassetto F. Polyurethane foam-covered breast implants: a justified choice? Eur. Rev. Med. Pharmacol. Sci. 2015;19(9):1600-1606.
41. Pompei S., Evangelidou D., Arelli F., Ferrante G. The Modern Polyurethane-Coated Implant in Breast Augmentation: Long-Term Clinical Experience. Aesthetic Surg. J. 2016;36(10):1124-1129. https://doi.org/10.1093/asj/sjw171
42. Pompei S., Arelli F., Labardi L., Marcasciano F., Evangelidou D. [et al.]. Polyurethane Implants in 2-Stage Breast Reconstruction: 9-Year Clinical Experience. Aesthet. Surg. J. 2017;37(2):171-176. https://doi.org/10.1093/asj/sjw183
43. Loreti A., Siri G., de Carli M., Fanelli B., Arelli F. [et al.]. Immediate Breast Reconstruction after mastectomy with polyurethane implants versus textured implants: A retrospective study with focus on capsular contracture. Breast. 2020;54:127-132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.breast.2020.09.009
44. de Vita R., Buccheri E. M., Villanucci A., Pozzi M. Breast Reconstruction Actualized in Nipple-sparing Mastectomy and Direct-to-implant, Prepectoral Polyurethane Positioning: Early Experience and Preliminary Results. Clin. Breast Cancer. 2019;19(2):e358-e363. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clbc.2018.12.015

Keywords: breast cancer, prepectoral reconstruction, silicone breast implant, mesh implant, capsular contracturе, animation deformity, radiation therapy