logo
Medical news
of the North Caucasus
Scientific journal
Mass media registration certificate dated December 7, 2006.
Series ПИ #ФС 77-26521.
Federal service for surveillance over non-violation of the legislation in the sphere of mass communications and protection of cultural heritage.
ISSN 2073-8137
rus
русский
eng
english

Site search



Correspondence address
310 Mira Street, Stavropol, Russia, 355017

Tel
+7 865 2352511, +7 865 2353229.

E-mail
medvestnik@stgmu.ru

Peculiarities of the orientation of the occlusion plane in people with different types of the gnatic part of the face

[Stomatology]
Victor Mazharov; Alexandr Korobkeev; Dmitry Domenyuk; Vladimir Shkarin; Sergey Dmitrienko; Yana Korobkeeva; Rashid Khasanovich Uzdenov; Taisia Surenovna Kochkonyan;

On profile teleroentgenograms of the head, obtained from 74 people of the first period of adulthood with physiological occlusion and normoinclination of the gnathic part of the face, the orientation of the following cephalometric planes was analyzed: plane of the skull base (N-Se); Frankfurt plane (Or-Po); the plane of the base of the upper jaw (Sna-Snp); occlusal plane (OcP); the plane of the base of the lower jaw in relation to the Dreyfus line (perpendicular to the «N-Se» line from the point «N»). Depending on the magnitude of the mandibular angle formed by the tangent lines to the branch and the body of the lower jaw, patients are divided into three groups with horizontal (n=22), neutral (n=29) and vertical (n=23) types of gnathic part of the face. Based on the results of studies of the cranio-facial complex, a method was developed for orienting the occlusal plane taking into account the gnathic part of the face, which does not depend on the topography of the incisors and the degree of their overlap. It was found that a diagnostically significant characteristic of the type of jaw growth is the value of the gnathic angle (SpP/MP), which is within 15° for the horizontal type of face, and 20° and 30° for the neutral and vertical type, respectively.

Download

References:
1. Khoroshilkina F. Ya. Ortodontiya. Defekty zubov, zubnykh ryadov, anomalii prikusa, morfofunktsional’nyye narusheniya v chelyustno-litsevoy oblasti i ikh kompleksnoye lecheniye. Moscow: «Meditsinskoye informatsionnoye agentstvo», 2010. (In Russ.).
2. Ivanyuta O. P., Al-Harasi G., Kuleshov D. A. Modification of the dental arch shape using graphic reproduction method and its clinical effectiveness in patients with occlusion anomalies. Archiv EuroMedica. 2020;10(4):181-190.
3. McNamara J. A., Brudon W. L. Orthodontic and orthopedic treatment in the mixed dentition. Needfarm Press. Inc., 1994.
4. Dickerson B., Thomas N. Precision transfer of maxillary position in articulator along sagittal and horizontal planes. Dental Market. 2009;5:65-68. (In Russ.).
5. Roshchina A. V., Panteleev V. D. Orientation of the occlusal plane in patients during orthodontic treatment. Rossysky stomatologichesky zhurnal. – Russian dental journal. 2014;3:33-35. (In Russ.).
6. Wolford L. M., Chemello P. D., Hillard F. H. Occlusal plane alteration – Effects on functional and esthetics. Am. J. Orthod. Dentofacial Ortop. 1994;304-316. https://doi.org/10.1590/2177-6709.20.5.050-057.oar
7. Rich H. Evaluation and registration of the H.I.P. plane of occlusion. Australian Dent. J. 1982;27(3):162-168.
8. Karkazis H. D., Polyzois G. L. Cephalometrically predicted occlusal plane: implications in removable prosthodontics. J. Prosthet. Dent. 1991;65(2):258-264.
9. Uzhumetskene I. I. Research methods in orthodontics. Moscow: Medicine, 1970. (In Russ.).
10. Nanda R. Biomechanics and Esthetic Strategies in Clinical Orthodontics. Saunders, 2005.
11. Korobkeev А. A., Grinin V. M., Shkarin V. V. Clinical and computer- tomographic diagnostics of the individual position of medial cutters in people with physiological occlusion. Meditsinskii vestnik Severnogo Kavkaza. – Medical news of North Caucasus. 2020;15(1):97-102. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.14300/mnnc.2020.15023
12. The Academy of Prosthodontics The Glossary of Prosthodontic Terms: 7th Edition. J. Prosthetic. Dentistry. 1999;81:39-110. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(99)70234-9
13. Proffit W. R., Fields H. W. Contemporary Orthodontics. Mosby, 2000.
14. Trezubov V. N., Shcherbakov A. S., Fadeyev R. A. Ortodontiya. Moscow: «Meditsinskaya kniga», Nizhniy Novgorod: «NGMA», 2000. (In Russ.).
15. Shkarin V. V., Grinin V. M., Khalfin R. A. Specific features of transversal and vertical parameters in lower molars crowns at various dental types of arches. Archiv EuroMedica. 2019;9(2):174-181. https://doi.org/10.35630/2199-885X/2019/9/2/174
16. Schwarz A. M. Die Rontgenostatik. Die Kieferorthopadische Diagnoze am Fern-Rontgenbild. Wien – Innsbruck: Urban und Scwarzenberg, 1958.

Keywords: Frankfurt plane, occlusal plane, physiological occlusion, teleradiography of the head, types of jaw growth


Founders:
Stavropol State Medical Academy
Pyatigorsk State Research Institute of Balneotherapeutics
Pyatigorsk State Pharmaceutical Academy